Perry, Bachmann and Reason: How Fundamental Dysfunctions of the Human Brain Make the Candidacy of these Republicans Possible in the 21st Century

Michael Shermer has written an interesting book about reason and the human brain. Entitled "The Believing Brain: From Ghosts and Gods to Politics and Conspiracies - How We Construct Beliefs and Reinforce Them as True," Shermer portrays the brain as a "belief engine" that drives its owner on pattern-seeking trips. The brain's processing capacity, regrettably, is not so good at reasoning. Early education, often infused with toxic, ludicrous beliefs, are not easily weeded out later in life. Once beliefs about the nature of reality are formed, decisions large and small are processed accordingly.

I found this perspective helpful while trying to make sense of Rick Perry's candidacy and enthusiasm for it by poor and middle-class followers. That anyone not already enmeshed in a fundamentalist Christian Republican Party worldview would not be appalled by Perry, as well as sister leading Tea Party lights like Bachmann, Palin and that ilk, calls out for a biological explanation.

J.M. Keynes defined capitalism as the extraordinary belief that "the nastiest of men for the nastiest of motives will somehow work for the benefit of all." Perry and the fundies love capitalism as practiced in the U.S. for the richest one percent of the population. That this vile man would also be embraced by non-rich Americans after doing little or nothing on their behalf for a decade as governor in Texas boggles the mind. Prayer leader Perry, the darlin of a fundamentalist cult called, "the New Apostolic Reformation," stands ready to lead a faith-based army seeking a "kingdom of God" - in this life, not just an imagined eternal existence that starts after death.

Listen to Perry and you can add separation of church and state to the causes of our economic meltdown, along with abortion, uppity women and gay marriage. Elect Perry and the Federal government will deal with "Jezebel" (a biblical whore), "Saul Structures" (an invisible pagan network of evil), demons, liberals, union members, anyone pro-choice or sympathetic to gays/lesbians/bisexuals or transgendered folks, anti-war activists, environmentalist or, god-forbid, anyone lacking a serious crush on Jesus. Perry considers Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid unconstitutional programs, "Ponzi" schemes bankrupting the country. Then there's that well known threat, expressed on several occasions, to lead Texas out of the Union. An awkward idea for someone who wants to lead that Union, presumably that includes Texas.

I believe it was R.D. Laing who observed, "It is no measure of mental health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society."

According to Shermer, we find reasons to support existing beliefs and resist evidence to the contrary. The smarter we are, the better our rationalizations.

What better explanation than Shermer's can explain a sitting governor who is not a member of any clergy using his secular office to address a religious congregation as follows: "Father, our heart breaks for America. We see discord at home, we see fear in the marketplace, we see anger in the halls of government. And as a nation, we have forgotten who made us, who protects us, who blesses us."

Whose father is he talking about? How did he determine that "our" hearts break for anyone or anything? Has there not always been discord at home, fear in the marketplace, anger in Congress? Who did make us, besides our parents? Who protects us from what, when and under what conditions? Isn't that what the police are for, if not the Armed Forces? Blesses us? What's a "blessing," anyway, and how does that work? This is all meaningless religious babble - it's conventional for high priests of all sects to go on like this, but it's dangerous folly when perpetrated on the public by an elected public official. We ought to be outraged. Well, some of us ARE outraged, but why not Republicans?

Shermer's ideas about pattern seeking and pattern protection offer an explanation. His concepts deserve the attention of REAL wellness promoters and everyone else. Shermer offers lots of evidence for his own assertions and cities studies that explain why inconvenient truths actually strengthen bogus beliefs founded on crappy ideology. No absurdity is too preposterous for the Republican faithful, as the latest Iowa straw poll suggests. Imagine - Bachmann for president! It boggles the mind. No wonder Borowitz wrote that Standard and Poor's took the "unprecedented action of downgrading Iowa's IQ." But Michele can't celebrate - Borowitz also predicted "tough sledding ahead ... a new poll shows Bachmann losing support to Texas Governor Rick Perry among voters who describe themselves as morons."

Shermer notes, as did Eric Hoffer in "The True Believer," that fundamentalist/ extremist/fanatics ignore contradictory evidence, and cherry-pick data for anything that supports existing beliefs. Hoffer did not have the studies of brain functioning available to Shermer, but he did have good intuition, as reflected in comments such as this: "An empty head is not really empty; it is stuffed with rubbish. Hence the difficulty of forcing anything in to an empty head."

In a review of Shermer's book published in this magazine, fellow columnist "Science Junkie" writes: "We are now experiencing in this country a veritable epidemic of science/reality denial. I sense growing hordes of ideologues rejecting reason and evidence in favor of spin, propaganda, dogma, and lies ... the reality-based community and concerned scientists are at a huge disadvantage trying to combat opponents who hold no respect for the constraints of reason and evidence...the challenge is to persuade people to listen to contradictory evidence and evaluate their own beliefs accordingly."

Shermer would endorse a wellness focus on reason, as he favors education that teaches people how to recognize and thereby resist malevolent snake-oil salesmen like Perry, Bachmann and Palin who poison the nation's atmosphere. To date, reason has not been a prominent element in wellness education on a par with fitness or nutrition, but we better learn to exercise common sense if we hope to overcome the patterns of nonsense laid down in the formative years and reinforced ever since.

But wait! Maybe common sense is overrated, or at least misinterpreted. Shermer's writing about the brain puts the focus on the importance of science and reason. "Common sense," as interpreted, can and often does lead us astray. After all, common sense is what the Tea Partiers think they have. John Dewey wrote, "Common sense is that which tells us that the earth is flat." Common sense -- the way people naturally think -- is what Shermer want us to try to overcome; critical thinking based on reason and evidence is uncommon sense. Uncommon sense requires training and discipline.

Good luck. Don't let me discourage you. Do what you can to stay well, fit and focused - and look on the bright side of life

 

 

TPJ MAG

The Divisive Misuse of a Religious Symbol, An Act Both Obnoxious and Irrational

Helen Thomas turned 90 last week. I wonder what she thinks about the destroyed remnant of a t-joint rubble beam hoisted as a centerpiece of the World Trade Center (WTC) Memorial in New York?

Well, I hope someone asks the good lady. I have an idea what she would say about the intrusion of religion into a public event that belongs equally to all Americans, of all religions and no religions.

Here is an exchange from a line of questioning Ms. Thomas had with the president at George W. Bush's first press conference in 2002:

Helen Thomas: "Mr. President, why do you refuse to respect the wall between the church and the state? And you know that the mixing of religion and government for centuries has led to slaughter. I mean, the very fact that our country has stood in good stead by having the separation-why do you break it down?"

Pres. Bush: "Helen, I strongly respect the separation of church and state..."

Thomas: "Well, you wouldn't have a religious office in the White House if you did . . . You are a secular official. And not a missionary. Atheists pay taxes, too."

Just so. And besides paying taxes, atheists (and Jews, Buddhists, Muslims, etc.) also died with Christians on 9/11. All died when 19 faith-based fanatics hijacked passenger planes to get to their blind dates with 72 virgins. Every one of these devout martyrs was hell-bent seeking eternal bliss. A bonus was the chance to exact a good measure of revenge against those with different ideas about religions different from theirs (i.e., "infidels").

But, the bogus Christian symbol, bogus because it is no more a sign of anything from the great beyond than the likeness of a god or goddess seen by some true believers in cookies, cloud patterns or the aftermath of tornado rubble. ("Look - the steeple remains. It's a sign from above. Praise Jesus.")

Ellery Schempp, a champion of the First Amendment who was instrumental in the protest against compulsive prayer in public schools leading to a Supreme Court ruling against the practice in 1963, stated that "public prayer is not intended to promote religious values but to enhance the authority of some churches and some political views over others.  (Speech at the convention of the Freedom from Religion Foundation annual meeting, Oct. 13, 2007.)

Some, including John Steward of "The Daily Show," a prominent liberal non-Christian, believe objections to the Christian cross at ground zero are ill advised. Why make a big deal of it? "Hey, it gives people comfort. Don't make waves. Let it go."

Well, that's what many advised Ellery Schempp and his parents to do. We are better off, I believe, that he and others through the years and continuing to this day, do not think much of this advice. We are fortunate, I think, that many like Mr. Schempp take separation of church/state seriously, and are willing to make waves and discomfort the faithful who insist in trying to push their religions into our faces. To put a stop to it, we must step forward and say, "no thanks."

Staying quiet and meet, making no objection to keep the peace is certainly an option. However, it seems unwise. A lot of non-Christians suffered from 9/11 events, including believers and freethinkers who favor reason over revelation. What does a cross contribute to their thoughts and feelings about the tragedy? What if another faith group were involved, say, Islamists who also lost family and friends at the memorial site? How would the Christian cross enthusiasts feel about a crescent and star t-beam (Islam) or a Shinto beam? Actually, because Jewish people have political power in New York, a Star of David (man-made, not plucked ready made from beam rubble), has been added. Why stop there? Would it not be more appropriate to give all religions representation or, to keep things simple and clean, none at on public land using public funds? Why not represent all faiths - or none - equally?

A 9/11 memorial should be religion neutral. Let's have the focus on the event and some symbol of recovery from it, not on religion, which inspired the disaster in the first place.

TPJ MAG

Crazy Talk in the U.S. Senate Reflects Badly on the Nation

Could you define or explain any of the following mysterious phrases?

Freedom’s holy light. What's that? What makes a light holy? How much energy does it require?

The pit of disunity and discord. Where is this pit? What happens if you fall into it? Can you get out? How did the pit get there? Why has it not been filled?

Bridges of cooperation. Where are such bridges? Who built them? Were they expensive? Are they like bridges to nowhere?

The one and only constituent in America that U.S. Senators absolutely MUST please. Who's that? Rupert Murdock? Which Koch brother? How much did he have to contribute for such influence? What if he's not pleased absolutely?

Counsel that can stand forever. How does that work? Are there any examples?

Ears and eyes that are "quickened." What happens when such parts are quickened? Does this mean powers like Superman?

God on Capitol Hill. Has this ever happened? When? Why did he leave?

If these phrases seem weird or incomprehensible, well, you must not be a member of the U.S. Senate. It turns out that someone addressed the senate last week and talked like that. I'm not kidding - you can look it up.

These phrases and others as bizarre were uttered last week by a Seventh-Day Adventist minister named Barry C. Black. Mr. Black is the Senate's official "chaplain." He asked the Almighty, in a prayer, to “give to our lawmakers the wisdom to know the role they should play in keeping freedom’s holy light bright.” Well, there you have it. Obviously, nothing happened. We see once again that nothing fails like prayer.

Language of this kind in any forum should be viewed as a mental health issue. However, a grotesque custom privileges religious talk - no demented babble, however ludicrous, raises eyebrows, let alone sets off 911 calls for the looney wagon.

If we were a rational people with a secular Republic, there would be no chaplains funded by taxpayers. There would be less crazy talk in the U.S. Senate, though Republicans and Tea Party types would supply some, no doubt. There certainly would be no expectation by the representatives of the people that an invisible sky god (for which there is no evidence whatsoever) would have any interest in becoming involved in our politics.

Besides, are we not still committed to government of the people, by the people and for the people? Why have a Congress at all if we have to rely on a deity to solve our problems?

Peace.

TPJ MAG

Should I Take REAL Wellness to the Next Level?

Lately, I've been thinking: maybe I should start a church. I got the idea, of all places, from the Wall Street Journal. (See Graeme Wood, "What Hubbard Wrought: The story behind the belief system that attracted Tom Cruise and Kirstie Alley," Wall Street Journal, July 8, 2011.)

I could make stuff up, like Joe Smith (gold plates), Vonnegut's Bokonon (boko-maru, grandalloons and karasses) and, more recently (1950), L. Ron Hubbard (Teegeeack, audits and the intergalactic warlord Xenu). I could prosper and grow rich with the Church of REAL Wellness, serving my flock. I could fund a few politicians, demand respect for my beliefs and have laws passed and customs nourished that rendered any criticism of my religion as disrespectful, maybe even blasphemous.

I chould do this but, as Richard Nixon would counsel, it would be wrong. Such practices are typical of religions, existing and fictional. But, it is not my nature to herd compliant sheep, unleash holy wars, erect gaudy temples, brainwash followers or invent insane accounts of revelation and self-glorifying commandments. No, I should instead pursue a different course. I should design a kinder, gentler church, one founded on reason (a first among the genre), exuberance rather than sorrow and fear, athleticism and liberty (another first, for as Ingersoll remarked, the bible "imprisons the brain and corrupts the heart").

I chould do such a thing, but at the moment, I lack what Republican presidential candidates brag about having, a "fire in the belly" for the mission. It takes a lot of work, not to mention creativity, to make up the kind of stuff that goes into a new religion. Also, I'd have to find my own John Travolta, Tom Cruise and Kirstie Alley-level celebrities to front for The Church of REAL Wellness. Who wants to spend that much time hanging out in Hollywood recruiting?

Perhaps this will change, and you might yet have an opportunity to convert to The Church of REAL Wellness.

 

Donald B. Ardell is the Well Infidel. He favors evidence over faith, reason over revelation and meaning and purpose over spirituality. His enthusiasm for reason, exuberance and liberty are reflected in his books (14), newsletter (583 editions of a weekly report) and many speeches.. Write Don at awr.realwellness@gmail.com

TPJ MAG

Should the FDA Regulate Religions?

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the government agency responsible for regulating food, dietary supplements, drugs, cosmetics, medical devices, biologics and blood products in the United States. Perhaps religion should be added to the FDA mission. Seriously, don't you think warning labels are as consequential concerning the dangers of religious promises and the consequences of fundamentalist addiction, as are the contents of cigarette packages? Tobacco kills, sure enough, but not nearly as efficiently or dramatically as weapons of mass destruction, some of which are now or soon will be in the hands of religious fanatics (e.g., in the nations of Iran, Israel, Pakistan and, eventually perhaps, non-state terrorist groups. In his 2008 film "Religulous," Bill Maher offered this observation: "Because of its power (religion) to divert man to destructive courses, the world could actually come to an end. The plain fact is, religion must die for mankind to live. The hour is getting very late to be able to indulge in having key decisions made by religious people."

Is this too harsh or, from my own perspective, optimistic? In my view, expecting religion "to die" within this or even another century seems unrealistic. Many philosophers and prominent leaders forecast the end of religion during the Enlightenment era in Europe and even in 19th century America. Alas, this bright side expectation was not to be. So, let's focus less on hopes for the death of religion and work instead for a little supervision, especially in this country, where secularism is under assault by aggressive Christianity.

What's there not to like about a little regulation of religion? Everyone is and would be free to worship whomever he/she pleases as desired, provided doing so does not inhibit or hazard the rights of others, believers and on-believers alike. Regulation of religious practices, if necessary due to suspected violations of the rights of others, would protect those rights.

I think people underestimate the mischief that religions excite from some enthusiasts. Just the other day, the Wall Street Journal contained an interesting piece by Mitch Horowitz entitled, "When Spirituality Kills: How should society regulate New Age gurus or Christian Scientists?" (See Wall Street Journal, July 8, 2011.) The article described the harmful practices of self-help, New Age sweat lodge guru James Ray. In 2009, Ray's followers paid a small fortune to be subjected to 36hours in a hut with no food and water, roasting in an Arizona sweat ceremony designed by the guru as "spiritually therapeutic." Health and safety issues were neglected, and no watchdog agency had authority to watch over and protect the Ray faithful. The only protection the Ray faithful had was their own common sense, and obviously the 56 participants were in serious arrears in this regard else they would not have been or at least remained there for so long. Three devotees died. The WSJ report cited other similar instances of religious lunacy and associated fatalities, including cases of Christian Science "mental healings" gone bad.

After reading the column, my first response was, "Why limit regulation to New Age gurus and Christian Scientists? How many New Age gurus or Christian Scientists were among the unlicensed pilots run amuck on 9/11? The WSJ piece made no mention of the Crusades, the Inquisition or other persecutions, holy wars and horrors of unregulated theocracies. Nor was attention given to ways that toxic superstitions threaten secular societies, particularly our own.

In his best-seller Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, Daniel Dennett identified many other ways that religion threatens the rights of secularists when seeking to control everyone's moral behavior by imposing their dogmas. Examples include "denying access to contraception while outlawing termination of pregnancy, criminalizing sexual acts between consenting adults, banning stem cell research, refusing the terminally ill access to assisted death, preventing inoculation of young girls against cervical cancer, and degrading science education with religious doctrine."

Regulation is required, it seems to me, not only against organizations that kill but also those that restrict freedoms and diminish the quality of life for all, not only their fervent supporters.

 

 

Donald B. Ardell is the Well Infidel. He favors evidence over faith, reason over revelation and meaning and purpose over spirituality. His enthusiasm for reason, exuberance and liberty are reflected in his books (14), newsletter (582 editions of a weekly report) and many speeches.. Write Don at awr.realwellness@gmail.com

TPJ MAG

Pastor Perry's Plan to Rouse God from Inaction, the Better to Help America and Perhaps the Pastor's Run for the Republican Nomination

Never mind details concerning separation of church and state - the fearless governor has set another day of prayer, this one for August 6 in partnership with the American Family Association at a stadium in Houston. 

There will be fasting, praying and bible reading and no doubt some whooping and hollering and flag waving. Every governor in the country has been invited to attend. All have been asked by Rev. Perry to proclaim their own shout outs to Jesus ir order to rescue the nation and world from disasters economic and natural, social and spiritual, not to mention saving us from terrorism, the debasement of our Christian culture and ObamaCare.

So far, God has done squat to help out in any of these realms, so the governor wants a big show and a lot of prayer energy sent skyward to get God off the dime, so to speak. 

The day will be modeled after a similar event described in the Book of Joel, so bring your slaves, goats and miracle requests and help the governor speed up the healing of the country, the rebuilding of communities and restoring those enduring values that somehow have not endured so well, whatever they might be. 

Never mind the naysayers who want to spoil the fun, like the head of the Secular Coalition for America, who said, "The last thing our officials should do in times of national struggle is promote a divisive religious event that proposes no real solutions to our country's real-world problems." The godless heathen Sean Faircloth went so far as to suggest that the governor's selfless call was "an insult to the millions of upstanding citizens who practice religions other than evangelical Christianity, as well as the millions of secular Americans who contribute to society without pushing their views on others and that religion should be a private matter, especially for elected officials in a secular government."

Well, what else would you expect from infidels and Pastafarians? 

Even more upsetting, a minister of the cloth, one Welton Gaddy, said Perry's call "raises serious concerns about his commitment to the boundaries between religion and government. It has been my experience that when elected leaders invoke religion in this way, it almost always has more to do with furthering a political agenda than a religious one."

Another nitpicker! What malcontents. Imagine suggesting that this sincere call to the faithful could in any way be associated with Rev. Perry's attempt to woo social conservatives. How cynical these blasphemers are. 

Many if not all our great Republican god-fearing governors will support the event, particularly Bobby Jindal in Louisiana, Haley Barbour in Mississippi, Bob Riley in Alabama, Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback, Rick Scott in Florida, Nikki Haley in South Carolina and Christine Gregoire in Washington. In fact, all these governors already have.

It's going to be a great day for Jesus in Houston - and maybe throughout the whole wide world. Maybe it will be good for Pastor Perry, too. Not that this is of any concern to him, however. 

For a smart summary of the event, watch this short video -  It's a commentary on the event from the Rev. Barry Lynn entitled, "I'm not a Cowboy." It kind of puts things in perspective.

TPJ MAG